![]() Importance Several recent US Supreme Court rulings have drawn criticism from the medical community, but their health consequences have not been quantitatively evaluated. Shared Decision Making and Communication.Scientific Discovery and the Future of Medicine.Health Care Economics, Insurance, Payment.Clinical Implications of Basic Neuroscience.Challenges in Clinical Electrocardiography.Annual Increase in Morbidity Due to Changed Management of Previable Premature Rupture of Membranes as a Result of Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization ![]() ![]() Annual Increase in the Number of Firearm-Related Nonfatal Injuries Resulting in Significant Body Region InjuryĮTable 7. Annual Increase in the Number of Firearm-Related Homicides in 6 May-Issue States as a Result of Bruen, All ScenariosĮTable 6. Estimated Effects of Implementation of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) Midpoint Estimate (Primary Scenario)ĮTable 5. Effect of Bruen on State Firearm Death Rates Under Differing State Policy Responses and Assumptions About Right-to-Carry Law EffectsĮTable 4. Studies Examining Impacts of Shall-Issue (or Related) Right-to-Carry State ProvisionsĮTable 3. Policy Responses of May-Issue States Following the Bruen DecisionĮTable 2. Deaths Among Nonvaccinated Adults Aged 18 to 64 Years With and Without Implementation of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) in 3 ScenariosĮTable 1. Supreme Court Rulings Examined in This Study and Approach to ModelingĮFigure.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |